Internet Research 



International mileage calculator:    http://www.infoplease.com/atlas/calculate-distance.html

Russian Strategic Missile Launch (60 seconds to launch):    http://englishrussia.com/index.php/2007/02/02/launch-of-russian-ballistic-missile/

www.globalresearch.ca
Centre for Research on Globalisation
Centre de recherche sur la mondialisation

 

Space bombs

by Alfred Lambremont Webre

Straight Goods, 24  July 2004
www.globalresearch.ca 27  July 2004

The URL of this article is: http://globalresearch.ca/articles/WEB407A.html


Despite US denials, proposed Ballistic Missile Defense structure lends itself to weapons in space.

US Missile Defence is part of a US strategy to convert Canada into a war-fighting client of the United States permanent warfare state. A March 31, 2004 Ipsos-Reid-Council of Canadians poll found that "seven in ten (69%) of Canadians disagree with the statement "Canada should actively support the Bush administration's missile defence system even if it may require dedicating military spending to the program or allowing US missile launchers in Canada." Because of this firm opposition to US Missile Defence amongst Canadians, deception and stealth are behind the US manipulation of a "Canadian decision" to join into the US Missile Defence, and thereby integrate Canada into the US permanent warfare state.

The United States timetable to weaponize space was promulgated on December 16, 2002, when US President George W Bush directed the US Department of Defense to:

(1) "develop and deploy missile defenses capable of protecting not only the United States and our deployed forces, but also friends and allies;

(2) also structure the missile defense program in a manner that encourages industrial participation by friends and allies, consistent with overall US national security; and

(3) shall promote international missile defense cooperation, including within bilateral and alliance structures such as NATO, and shall negotiate appropriate arrangements for this purpose." - US President George W. Bush, US National Security Presidential Directive/NSPD-23, December 16, 2002.

Canada's decision to participate in NORAD operation of the aerospace early-warning system for North America means that Canada functionally joins US Missile Defence. NORAD at present is involved only in air warning, not in an outer space- warning system. International Tactical and Warning and Attack Assessment (ITWAA) retaliation and attack toward incoming missiles are not now part of NORAD.

If Canada agrees to NORAD's operation of an expanded aero- space early-warning system, then this means that Canada is participating as part of the US Missile Defence system. Under an expanded NORAD, the tracking and retaliatory functions of the US Missile Defence system cannot practicably be separated. By being part of NORAD, Canada would functionally be part of the US Missile Defence system.

Thus, Canada's signing onto "an aerospace early-warning system for North America", is in fact "a move that smoothes the path for almost certain participation in the US missile defence shield." (Globe & Mail, April 30, 2004.)

The US National Missile Defence system, whether land-based, sea-based, air-based or space-based, will cause the weaponization of space. If Canada becomes involved with land- based US Missile Defence, this will include a network of sensors and command and control nodes which may be used for space based weapons.

(1) Land-based Missile Defence can be used as an anti-satellite weapon (ASAT). If Canada becomes involved with US Missile Defence and the US decides to use a land-based interceptor against an object orbiting in space, as an anti-satellite weapon (ASAT), Canada would be involved in using space weapons. According to one NGO expert, US Missile Defence could more easily be used as an anti -satellite weapon than as an interceptor for an incoming missile;

(2) Elements of the US Missile Defence space-based surveillance and tracking system can be used as space weapons. The US NFIRE satellite, although it is theoretically only for surveillance and tracking, can be equipped with a Kill-Vehicle. Other US Missile Defence-related dual using light-weight optics, relay mirrors and precision tracking systems can be used for space- based weapon applications;

(3) The US Defence budget calls for spending on a space-based missile defence range. According to one observer, "the US Administration and US Missile Defence Agency have explicitly included plans for a space-based layer, as well as ground-based and sea-based elements, in the proposed missile defence network. This entire Missile Defence network will use a common set of sensors and command and control nodes.

Providing support for the space-based sensors, as Canada may find an attractive option, would support all elements of the US Missile Defence system, including, if it exists a space-based layer. The US President's budget includes the Future Years Defense Program (FYDP) and asks for six-year funding increases for US Missile Defence Interceptors PE, including funding for a space- based missile defence range;"

(4) The US Air Force Transformation Flight Plan (November 2003) calls for "active-on- board protection capabilities, "full-spectrum sea, air land and space-based offensive counterspace systems capable of prevention of unauthorized use of friendly space services and negating capabilities from low earth up to GEO orbits. The focus when practical will be on denying adversary access to space on a temporary basis." When impractical, permanently destructive weapons such as US Ballistic Missile Defence would be used, by implication.

By joining US Missile Defence, Canada becomes an accidental or intentional nuclear weapons target and part of the nuclear war-fighting forces of the United States military. The Anti- Satellite (ASAT) weapons capabilities of US Missile Defence, make land-based missile defense interceptors into space weapons to be used to destroy, for example, Russian early warning satellites, in the case of a pre-emptive first strike by the US nuclear forces against the Russia.

Authorities ranging from Noam Chomsky to Robert Bowman indicate that land-based US Missile Defence is a space weapon in aid of strategic nuclear first strike. If Canada, like Australia, were to become a US missile defence client nation, it would mean that Canada functionally has become part of the US nuclear war- fighting machine. US Missile Defence, whose radars will be in Nunavut, are targeted at Russia, not at "rogue states."

(5) US Missile Defence is a profoundly destabilizing, global problem demanding a global solution in the form of a Space Preservation Treaty banning Missile Defence systems and space-based weapons. The profound threat of a renewed nuclear arms race as well as an arms race in space is the reason why six British Columbia cities, including Vancouver, Victoria, Nanaimo, Burnaby, Sparwood, and Bowen Island, BC have all passed municipal Resolutions opposing Canada's participation in missile defence and demanding Canada host a Space Preservation Treaty Conference to ban missile defence systems and space-based weapons worldwide, as Canada did in the 1997 Ottawa Land Mines Conference. This ban will transform the war industry into a peaceful, cooperative, democratic Space Age economy.

Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, M. Ed., is International Director of the Institute for Cooperation in Space (ICIS), and works with others to transform the permanent war economy into a peaceful, democratic, cooperative Space-age society.


Email this article to a friend

To express your opinion on this article, join the discussion at Global Research's News and Discussion Forum , at http://globalresearch.ca.myforums.net/index.php

The Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) at www.globalresearch.ca grants permission to cross-post original Global Research (Canada) articles in their entirety, or any portions thereof, on community internet sites, as long as the text & title of the article are not modified. The source must be acknowledged as follows: Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) at www.globalresearch.caFor cross-postings, kindly use the active URL hyperlink address of the original CRG article. The author's copyright note must be displayed. (For articles from other news sources, check with the original copyright holder, where applicable.). For publication of Global Research (Canada) articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: editor@globalresearch.ca

For media inquiries: editor@globalresearch.ca

© Copyright belongs to the author, 2004. For fair use only/ pour usage équitable seulement.


 

[home]


Well, if your not sure what is going on with Obama being in the office, everyone seems to be legally incorrect in their complaint about him being born in the United States or not. THAT IS NOT THE ISSUE AT ALL!!! The FBI reported that the real problem is his birth certificate is a forgery. Now you know if you went down to DMV to register your vehicle with false documents you would be arrested. Below, "Final Research on President Obama's Birth Certificate," the person writing this article goes into detail about the forgery, and he gives his name and education in authentication of documents:


But first a comment from SEARCH: HOW TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT, under COMMENTS, (or), http://www.wisegeek.com/what-are-the-requirements-to-run-for-president-in-the-united-states.htm

@120 When will you "birthers" get it through your thick skulls that it doesn't matter where Obama was born? If he had a parent who was an America (and he did), he is automatically an American citizen, regardless of where he was born.

Even if you guys were right about him being born outside the US (and you're not), the fact that his mother is an American means that he is an American as well. You guys are wrong - end of discussion.

- anon142938

See what I mean. He doesn't know about the forgery.


Final research on President Obama's Birth Certificate:    SEARCH: OBAMA VS TECHDUDE  ,(or), http://www.google.com/search?q=obama+vs+techdude&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

but, before it gets removed from the internet, here it is:

(Obama, according to the KGO Radio 740 AM news April 2nd, 2011 4PM PST News, President Obama stated that he was going to register for re-election, first thing Monday morning, because he wanted to be the first person filing for the 2012 presidential campaign).

« UN SOLDIERS SALUTE HEZBOLLAH TERRORISTS | Main | Obama, Marketing over Matter ... Hitler would be pleased »

Sunday, July 20, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c60bf53ef00e553abf5a08833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference ATLAS EXCLUSIVE: FINAL REPORT ON OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE FORGERY CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN:

» Pamela Geller At Atlas Shrugs Claims Obama Birth Certificate A Forgery from Advice Goddess Blog
What do you think? Here's an excerpt from Atlas reader techdude's analysis... [Read More]

» Techdude Report: Real Change We Can Finally Believe In - Obama Certificate Of Birth Is A Fake from Hyscience
"... irrefutable, empirical evidence - Obama's birth certificate is a forgery." The only remaining question is why!... [Read More]

» Barack Obama Watch: Birth Certificate Forgery Flap from FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog
[Read More]

» Manchurian Candidate? .... from The Discerning Texan
For several months now, many Republicans have been questioning why Barack Obama has not released his birth certificate. Well, this week the Daily Kos finally did release a jpg of a purported "Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth" (basically a certificati... [Read More]

» "Who Sent You?" -- The Coming Attack on Obama from Seeing the Forest
At least one major right-wing smear attack on Obama may be gearing up. I'll call it the "Who Sent You" campaign. As weird as it sounds -- and it is weird stuff -- the gist of it is that Obama's... [Read More]

» Found: Obama's Birth Certificate! from snapped shot
I know you've been reading recent reports about how some forgery or another, but finally, we've found a conclusively genuine B. Hussein Obama birth certificate! Let this end the debate, once and for all! [Link] [Read More]

» Great Moments in Election-Year Blogging from Jon Swift
The conservative blogosphere deserves to win a collective Pulitzer Prize for its election-year coverage. [Read More]

» Sign the petition to release Barack Hussein Obama's certificate of live birth from Hyscience
At the current rate, before the end of December, there will be 1 million signed up on this petition. It can happen faster if you help circulate the petition which should be sufficient evidence of public interest for nearly any judge:The petition states... [Read More]

Comments

jj said...

techdude:

awesome, dude.

it is interesting to see what the apologist[s] for the kos document have to say.

pamela:

yes, atlasshrugs is awesome, too. a really fine, definitive report on the issue of the authenticity of the daily kos document. it is a phoney.

the question must be asked, why has this document been fronted.

the further question must be asked, and it is of most importance, and that is, why has osama bin bama not offered a legitimate certificate of live birth, capable of authentication in proof of his assertion of citizenship.

finally, this observation must be made.-- the democratic party should be very careful that it nominates somebody to run for potus who is, in fact and in law, eligible to be elected to office. those stories circulating of obama's birth in kenya and subsequent application for a c.o.l.b. in hawii take on a new resonance.

john jay

kobi said...

the dhimmicrats may be waiting until the election...if oybomba gets in and then is proved ineligible...won't the office go to the vp?

i hope that this will be taken to court asap.

cjean said...

Thank you Techdude! Thank you Pamela!

JBean said...

Excellent work, Techdude!
I have a feeling KOS is about the see what the underside of the bus looks like. As Pamela asks: Why? Why do something this stupid? The answer, or lack thereof, should be interesting, to say the least.

Shy Guy said...

I don't understand.

US law requires Presidents to be native born US citizens.

If someone cannot or refuses to prove it, how can they be a presidential candidate?

bvw said...

With all respect and regard for yourself and techdude -- there is now also a civic duty as great as uncovering the forgery in the identifying, finding and questioning the cretins who vandalized the car and who tortured the rabbit to death, both done to intimidate an investigator into a key matter of a federal election.

Ray_in_Aus said...

The sociologists and statistics experts will find this politically driven erroneous report quite fascinating, and the Mac users will step up their bragging about their superior software.

Spectre said...

"Either a real COLB was scanned into Photoshop and digitally edited or a real COLB was first scanned to obtain the graphic layout then blanked by soaking the document in solvent to remove the toner. After rescanning the blank page to a separate image the graphics from the previously obtained scan could then be easily applied to the blank scan after some editing and rebuilding. It would also explain why date stamp bleeds through the paper and the various bits of toner located around the image as well as the remnants of the previous location of a security border."

That would also explain why the border lines are not as crisp (washed out) as on the authentic certificate.

Here's a dumb question - If the seal is impressed on the back of the certificate, and was seen on the front in the KOS certificate, wouldn't the seal appear as a mirror image on the front if stamped on the back? I am not a forensic document examiner, but any bleed through stamps from the back of a document generally appear as a reversed image on the front. Or is the representation here that the KOS certificate was stamped on the front and not on the back (if so, it would further seem that we would have a better image of the seeal)?

turn said...

Shy Guy-

There are many qualifications for being a 'native born' citizen. McCain was born in Panama and is fully able legal to be POTUS.

If Obomba was naturalized (as my ex is) there would be public records.

If he was born in Kenya and transported to Hawaii then his COLB would have needed to be forged at least by the time he entered public school in Hawaii after returning from Indonesia.

Pamela Geller said...

hey Ray_in_Aus -- who are you working for?

someone wrote: "AJ called out Techdude, expert in the field of forensic digital forgery examination in a ridiculously titled post: How 9-11 Helped Cause The Obama Birth Certificate Silliness. The thing I don't understand is why doesn't AJ wait for this expert's full report which we have emphatically made clear would be released shortly."
[to which Ray responded]
Presumably because AJ has an IQ that is high enough for him to see that no credible "report" will never be forthcoming.

double negative- literally and metaphorically :)here

Pamela Geller said...

Look, if there was a birth certficate in Kenya, why wouldn't McCain (or the Clintonistas back when she wanted that nomination more than life itself) tracked it down.

Further, why wouldn't the Kenyan President Mwai Kibaki release it. Obama vigorously supported and campaigned for Odinga. Odinga is Kibaki's arch rival and nemesis. Odinga was/is a violent inciter that caused Kibaki and the Kenyan people no small punishment of blood and violence.

Obama and Odinga alliance here. Scroll for campaign pictures of Obama and Odinga together.

All I am saying is we don't know why. The question is why.

Ray_in_Aus said...

Pamela Geller wrote:

hey Ray_in_Aus -- who are you working for?

someone wrote: "AJ called out Techdude, expert in the field of forensic digital forgery examination in a ridiculously titled post: How 9-11 Helped Cause The Obama Birth Certificate Silliness. The thing I don't understand is why doesn't AJ wait for this expert's full report which we have emphatically made clear would be released shortly."

[to which Ray responded]

Presumably because AJ has an IQ that is high enough for him to see that no credible "report" will never be forthcoming.

double negative- literally and metaphorically :
====================

[Ray]: That minor error ("never" -v- "ever") was the result of inserting alternative text, but I assumed everyone would join the dots. In any case I as right about AJ Strata's IQ. The report is not at all credible.

It might have got 6 out of 10 in a competition to write a fictional account of an Obama COLB forgery, but in a forgery trial the expert witness for the prosecution would probably have the jury laughing, and the prosecutor would be reprimanded and declared to be a vexatious litigant.

Pamela Geller said...
but in a forgery trial the expert witness for the prosecution would probably have the jury laughing,
uh ... techdude is and has been the expert witness for the prosecution....

lol

Ray_in_Aus said...

Well obviously not for anything like this.

norman said...

I don't think all this stuff is going to make one bit of difference to the outcome of the election, in which I believe Obama will win. After what Bill Clinton got away with before and during his presidency, all standards have been discarded. Most of the people voting today don't care about our traditional standards. It looks like a downward trajectory. Another great empire is stumbling to its end.

Yidwithlid said...

Ray_in_Aus
Its easy to put something down...much harder to prove it... IF this was a trial the other side would bring in a forensics expert of their own to disprove the other's story. WHERE IS YOURS POSTED?
Oh nowhere? so you are criticizing with out expert facts? Sounds like obamas statements on the surge.

kingronjo said...

Hey Pam,

excuse my dopiness, but has anyone thought to ask his Grandma? After she shakes off the track marks from the bus I believe she might have some insight as to where the Messiah was born. Perhaps she will say, perhaps not, worth a phone call tho.

And I unfortunately agree with Ray, Obama at one of the debates could emphatically declare, "I was born in Red China and am the Manchurian candidate" and he still would get the votes he's going to get.

jj said...

ray_in_aus:

techdude has said all along that he welcomes peer review of his work.

it is public. it explains his methodology. it has the empirical results of his testing. it is open to scrutiny and criticism.

i suspect, ... , hell, i am fully confident, that it will stand to peer review.

the implications of the report are quite obvious to all but the most incredulous of minds.--the state of hawaii prints consistently good and substantially identical document, e.g., c.o.l.b.'s, every time out the printer, and the daily kos does not measure up in terms of image quality, image, ink mixture, and the very locations and patterns on the borders of the document. the daily kos document, in all probability, therefore, was not printed/created by the state of hawaii, it does not meet its standards of consistency, and the document is a fake and those who propound it do so presumably for ulterior motive.

let us see what the peer review says.

techdude has done a courageous thing. he has prepared his report, he has published it, and he has put it into the public scrutiny where it will stand or fall.

others have voiced opinions, not capable of substantiation, and most certainly not capable of review or testing, and therefore not subject to any meaningful criticism. a test of warm breezes, as it were.

techdude is a stalwart fellow, personally and intellectually. i laud him.

john jay
milton freewater, oregon usa

Ray_in_Aus said...

norman wrote:

"I don't think all this stuff is going to make one bit of difference to the outcome of the election [....] "

Of course it won't because Obama WAS born in August 1961 in Hawaii and he DIDN'T participate in any forgery of his COLB. If Obama is the Democrats preferred leader on election day his party should score well and he will not be undermined by any of this eligibility stuff.

This whole issue has made me think more about what AJ said about propaganda - and how some of it gets out of hand. Frankly, I disagree with some of his view about the amount of propaganda that has prevailed, but this whole exercise has put me in a frame of mind to re-visit some of it.

I wasn't aware of how much the media (on both sides of the fence) lied and distorted things until last year when I was following the Gitmo stuff very closely, but this exercise has shown me that the distortion goes way beyond the media.

Ray_in_Aus said...

kingronjo wrote:

And I unfortunately agree with Ray, Obama at one of the debates could emphatically declare, "I was born in Red China and am the Manchurian candidate" and he still would get the votes he's going to get.
-----

I'm not sure what we agree upon, but let me prefix this by saying that personally I'd like to see Hillary win - not because she's the best person for the job, but because she's the best the Democrats can put in the job.

Obama is however looking better all the time (to me) despite him seeming like some sort of 'Hollywood production' built to a winning formula that is guaranteed to suck in the impressionable voters. The only BIG thing he's got (in my book) is his reasonable understanding of Islam as well as the terrorists NOT seeing him as "another white guy with the same old values". That could be good for world peace.

kingronjo said...

Ray wrote:

I don't think all this stuff is going to make one bit of difference to the outcome of the election, in which I believe Obama will win.

Pretty clear to follow I thought that anything The Messian says or does will not sway those who follow him with a religious fervor. Only hope is the 'bitter clingers' who aren't smart to recognize his perfection.

Ray_in_Aus said...

Yidwithlid wrote:

"Its easy to put something down...much harder to prove it... IF this was a trial the other side would bring in a forensics expert of their own to disprove the other's story. WHERE IS YOURS POSTED?" [...]

If there was a trial, the onus would be on the prosecution to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Obama (a) Provided a false birth date and location and (b) Conspired to forge a digital image with the intention to defraud. He would not have to prove a thing. He could however discredit more than enough of the allegations to have the case tossed out of court.

Ray_in_Aus said...


kingronjo wrote:

Ray wrote:

I don't think all this stuff is going to make one bit of difference to the outcome of the election, in which I believe Obama will win.

Pretty clear to follow I thought that anything The Messian says or does will not sway those who follow him with a religious fervor. Only hope is the 'bitter clingers' who aren't smart to recognize his perfection.

I didn't write that - it was norman. You probably got the names mixed up because of the illogical way the names are placed with posts on this blog.

Ray


RISE_UP said...

Obama is however looking better all the time (to me) despite him seeming like some sort of 'Hollywood production' built to a winning formula that is guaranteed to suck in the impressionable voters. The only BIG thing he's got (in my book) is his reasonable understanding of Islam as well as the terrorists NOT seeing him as "another white guy with the same old values". That could be good for world peace.

Don't that say it all? Let me see....(just a few.List too long to type)
Obama understands there are 57 states.
Dead men attend his rallies.....
The japanese dropped a bomb on Pearl Harbor....
and now he understands Islam....
Last and perfect description of all above...BULLLLLL SHIT

se said...


Why do you use the Michele COLB to claim that the text in the Obama COLB is in a different location?

Were you not aware of the fact that the location of the text in the Obama COLB is in the SAME location as the text in the DeCosta, Smith and Tomoyasu COLBs? And that it is in fact the text in the Michele COLB which is in a different location than ALL of the others, including Obama's?

Did this oversight occur due to VERY sloppy analysis, or was it an intentional attempt to deceive?

se

herself311 said...

This needs to get out to the American public. I sent it on but others have to, also. How do we get the media to take a look....or a district attorney to have more experts look at Obama's birth certificate? If it is indeed a forgery, this man needs to be prosecuted followed by prison. This is a serious crime.

Ray_in_Aus said...

john jay wrote:

ray_in_aus:

techdude has said all along that he welcomes peer review of his work.

it is public. it explains his methodology. it has the empirical results of his testing. it is open to scrutiny and criticism.

i suspect, ... , hell, i am fully confident, that it will stand to peer review.

No it won't. It's full of holes.

the implications of the report are quite obvious to all but the most incredulous of minds.--the state of hawaii prints consistently good and substantially identical document, e.g., c.o.l.b.'s, every time out the printer, and the daily kos does not measure up in terms of image quality, image, ink mixture, and the very locations and patterns on the borders of the document.

No, That's not the case at all. They produce 3rd rate images. I've been a graphic reproducer for a long time and I wouldn't dare to delivers stuff like that to a big customer like a Health Department - especially for certificates that people value or treasure.

the daily kos document, in all probability, therefore, was not printed/created by the state of hawaii, it does not meet its standards of consistency, and the document is a fake and those who propound it do so presumably for ulterior motive.

let us see what the peer review says.

Non-peers could knock over most of the report.

techdude has done a courageous thing. he has prepared his report, he has published it, and he has put it into the public scrutiny where it will stand or fall.

Yes, of course it's courageous. A lot of effort has been put in, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was biased before he started. In any case it's a fascinating puzzle for us all to follow, so it's not a waste of time.

others have voiced opinions, not capable of substantiation, and most certainly not capable of review or testing, and therefore not subject to any meaningful criticism. a test of warm breezes, as it were.

I disagree. I think most people's statements could be followed up and the issues could be resolved if there was enough incentive, such as enough readers who wanted a definitive answer about an issue.

techdude is a stalwart fellow, personally and intellectually. i laud him.

Well we've all seen how some high flying lawyers have lost some big cases in the Supreme Courts throughout the years - and they too looked very credible on the surface.

In Australia I think our Federal government loses about 50% of it's cases in the Hight Court (the equivalent of the U.S. Supreme Court).

Ray

se said...

My apologies. It wasn't the MicheleCOLB that was used for the text shifting.

However the text location in the Obama COLB is the same as the location for the DeCosta, Smith and Tomoyasu COLBs.

se

jj said...

ray_in_aus:

a few simple questions posed to you, and, direct replies from you, if you would.--

why does not the obama for potus campaign simply produce barrack obama's original birth certificate from the state of hawaii, if there is one?

why will not the obama for potus campaign waive all privacy interests in the birth certificate purportedly in the possession of the state of hawaii's department of vital statistics and authorized the registrar of hawaii's vital statistics to release the document to the public?

he is, afterall, running for president of the united states, and should be willing to definitively establish the bona fides of his birth, and of his citizenship. it doesn't seem to be too much to ask of him, after all, he wants so much more from all of us. he wants us to give him the authority of his finger on "the button:" the very least he should do is prove definitively that he is an american citizen eligible to run for president. as a matter of fact, he is legally required to prove that.

john jay
milton freewater, oregon usa

Yidwithlid said...

ray_in_aus you say its full of holes...PLEASE Get your expert and show us the holes. There is no football on today so I am free all day. Produce your expert because all you are showing is your bravado.

Ray_in_Aus said...

RISE_UP wrote:

[Ray]: Obama is however looking better all the time (to me) despite him seeming like some sort of 'Hollywood production' built to a winning formula that is guaranteed to suck in the impressionable voters. The only BIG thing he's got (in my book) is his reasonable understanding of Islam as well as the terrorists NOT seeing him as "another white guy with the same old values". That could be good for world peace.

Don't that say it all? Let me see....(just a few.List too long to type)
Obama understands there are 57 states.
Dead men attend his rallies.....
The japanese dropped a bomb on Pearl Harbor....

A few more than one bomb, but there would have been a LOT less bombs dropped if the Australian pilots' frantic messages had been passed on to Pearl Harbor. "Japanese armada heading to Pearl in a scorpion formation" (that formation is an ancient Japanese war formation).

They got us badly on the way back (one third of the fleet). Most of it was kept secret for 60 years.

Ray

Dale in Atlanta said...

I've been reading "Ray_in_Aus" comments, over at AJ's board, as well as here, ever since he inserted himself into this discussion as some kind of "expert"!

Unlike "Techdude", who has proven his expertise, and who is, "Ray", has only hurled insults, and demands that we believe him, with no proof, nor technical analysis.

Even AJ tried to prove it technically.

Now, I'm not a technical "expert"; so I've had to watch this play off between "techdude", and AJ; I think they both have honorable intent, and for the non-technical among us, we have to make our own judgement, based upon the competing versions, and decide who to believe.

But as for "Ray" in Australia, the very fact that he admitted above, that he's a Hillary AND an Obama Fan, immediately Invalidates any and all things he says in this discussion.

End of story; "Ray" has no expertise, and more important, anything he says regarding it is clearly slanted in favor of Obama, thus feel free to ignore any and all his statements henceforth!

PS: "Ray", I was correct, here, and over AJ's, when I said this was a forgery, and once and for all, "techdude" has proven it.

(and)

SEARCH: ATLAS SHRUGS, Then Select in menu: OBAMAS BIRTH CERTIFICATE FORGERY  ,(OR), http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/07/atlas-exclusive.html

Obama Rips The Constitution:    SEARCH: http://www.google.com/search?q=obama+rips+the+constittion&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

OFF THE GRID NEWS: FOOD CONTAMINATION AND SHORTAGE IN USA:    http://www.offthegridnews.net/wnd125b.html?utm_source=WNDB_Foodshock_125x200_March25&utm_medium=WNDB_Foodshock_125x200_March25&utm_term=WNDB_Foodshock_125x200_March25&utm_content=WNDB_Foodshock_125x200_March25&utm_campaign=WNDB_Foodshock_125x200_March25


File:   

Original Declaration of Independence

 

(Excerpt):

 

But when a long train of abuses, usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, the events is a design to reduce them on their absolute despotism and is their right and their duty to throw off such government and provide new guards for their new security.

 

(People don’t talk that way anymore):

 

“It means if there is something wrong, those who have the ability to take action have the responsibility to take action.” Nicolas Cage    DVD Movie, National Treasure

 

The reference is made to those in the United States Government who would work to destroy the Original Declaration of Independence, (or even the AMENDMENTS to the CONSTITUTION),

 

A citizen has the constitutional right to make a law, when it is obvious the government is working against the People, to overthrow any law so created by the government.




File:  TheSituation09152010

The situation the world is in now sounds just like: this woman who had two boys, bought them one toy. The two little boys fought all the time over that one toy. The mother decided that the only way she could protect the two boys from hurting each other, was to take away that toy.



File:  TheUnitedStatesASurvey01222011

 CAUTION /// CAUTION /// CAUTION!!!

What Was The United States Created To Stand For?

 

 

THE UNITED STATES

A survey of what their citizens have been taught, and what they believe:

 

      This Land of and The United States Government was founded and fought for by our forefathers and us on certain concrete principals and we the people have continued to fight to maintain those principals that we the people needed to remain free from being part of any other country and our country from other countries principals and government, by forming processes to guarantee the continued existence of the United States, and to protect the citizens born of the United States for their continued guaranteed freedoms:

 

 1]  The document of The Declaration of Independence was written, signed and dated, which gave those people the internationally recognized right to fight, if necessary, for the claim of land for a new country when the founders of the United States originally formed and founded the country,

 

 2]  the Constitution of United States by “We The People” in the form of the Supreme Court, which was written for all times protects itself from its original articles from being changed or struck down for “as long as” this country does not change hands or it is struck down, is a country called “The United States of America” with its Citizens born there, and for continued enforcement as being this country, The United States of America, must be led by a Civilian President who must be born in the United States because he is the supreme commander of our military and he must have our ways to heart,

 

 3]  the United States Federal Constitution’s Bill of Rights which are the first ten articles in the United States Constitution, which safeguards the citizens fundamental and basic rights as a United States Citizen, has been adopted out of the United States Constitution by all 50 states in the United States as their State Bill of Rights of Citizens,

 

 4]  reciting The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States, which is a privilege of any Citizen of the United States to recite, and a Citizen of the United States “can” be called upon by their government in rules set forth to recite in public places, which purpose of reciting “is” to enforce the knowledge and that the concept is not forgotten, that a citizen, (especially if born in the United States), of this country must defend the homeland if there is a war,

 

 5]  and reciting The Lords Prayer, according to the freedom of the right of speech, is a citizens choice “when to do it” in a place of worship, however since the United States of America has placed recognition of this country being permitted to exist by God thus far, and printing “In God We Trust” on our currency, the United States enforcement of civil rights only goes so far, in that reciting the Lords Prayer “can” be required to be recited in public places, as a recognition of why our country exists and a tribute to our God,

 

 6]  the United States Government “controls” by usually written laws, but also presidential oral laws, and in emergencies martial laws, the enforcement of “these” Citizens civil rights by the Courts which is overseen by the United States Supreme Court, which is the highest civilian court in the Land, except in which a civilian matter of a military court martial is “the highest court in the land,” and is the highest civilian prosecution for a citizen, in the form of it is the highest criminal prosecution of a citizen controlled by the President of The United States and of the civilian government, which the military government is set up by, and controlled by the President of The United States.

 

 7]  the United States military, and other branches of the United States Government, are governed by the President of the United States, and they are assigned daily responsibilities by the President, and following those orders is a must. In the event that the President consults with these branches of government on matters, and they strongly do not agree, if the President proceeds against the advise of the military, or other departments of the government, if a department of the government or the military proceeds against the President without taking him out of office through a legal process called Impeachment, this is called Treason,

 

 8]  the branches of the government whom are responsible for the actions of the President of the United States in the event that the President proceeds to commit an act against the Citizens of the United States vary depending on what we are talking about. If the military can not enforce Constitutional or other responsibilities due to Orders from the President, the Civilian Branches of government can not enforce the Constitution while undergoing strong military might control,

 

 9]  when the courts in the United States hear a charge for a crime from the prosecuting attorney’s office and refuse to listen to any defendant ask to be informed of more than just the excerpt crime committed in law written in a law book, that the written law is not a crime in itself, the court system refuses to inform the defendant “what he did, or what he said that constitutes a crime.” The judge court orders a public defender to defend the defendant as the Defense Counsel and also the Court is a player in a “out-of-courtroom” plea bargain wherein the public defender states that it doesn’t matter whether you believe you are not guilty or not; that the only thing that matters is if you don’t sign the plea bargain you’re going to do time. Of course the objective of the defendant is to not do time, and he signs the confession, never knowing what he was accused of saying or doing. If he appeals the conviction, the appellate courts still will not tell him:

 

Under the misdemeanor court’s procedural rules and regulations governing itself, placed there by the felony court holding the jurisdiction of the misdemeanor court which it must follow its superior court rules in the way it has decided to conduct it court, the same as if you were a defendant in the felony court, the jurisdiction and those rules extend outward to the defendant by the higher courts in the enforcement of “defendant rights.” These rights are withheld from you the defendant, first in the document you sign as a defendant of the advisement of your rights as a defendant by the court:

 

1] The advisement of rights does not include advising you of your right to refuse your hearing(s) to be heard by a commissioner, in which case your hearing(s) must be before a Judge.

 

2] The advisement of rights that you sign does not include advising you that the interpretation of the law enacted by the legislature by the office of transcription and the rest of the court system to include the judge and bailiff is that you do not have a right to a full transcription of everything that everyone says during your hearings until you reach the first hearing once your trial has begun. The interpretation of the legislative law is that the courts can adopt their own procedure to “short hand transcription” in which doing the transcriber assigned to your court is only required to put things said into his own words and understanding of what was said, and to report only what that particular transcriber thinks is important to transcribe in the way he reports, under the direction of the court, that the transcript be free of all flaws and appealable issues, so that the plea acceptance, plea bargain, and sentencing appear in the transcript as fair. Any objections or disagreements by the defendant about the plea bargain being forced onto the defendant in the signing by the public defender or the court itself are omitted in the conversation with the judge about the members of the court which led up to the sentence. If an appeal is launched to this forced plea bargain, the transcript is clean of all discrepancies and there is nothing appealable for a higher court to reverse on.

 

3] The position you are in as a defendant wrongly convicted under these conditions is that in some states like California, it is provided under law that even after sentencing, if you are not completely happy with your plea or sentencing, you have a right to “reset” your case to Trial.

 

4] Resetting your case to trial however can result in a maximum sentence if convicted.

 

5] If you know you want a trial in another county for example, if you are charged with a misdemeanor, the court will look at the expense of doing that as too costly for just a misdemeanor and deny the trial to be out of county, even if you explain to the court that the charges are falsely filed against you and that you do not accept the responsibility for any of their mistakes.

 

6] If you push hard enough, the appellate court has the power to reduce your sentence to completion early, which in that case, since your appellate rights are exhausted the same time your sentence is completed, the court is satisfied that the arrest and conviction is maintained.

 

 

10]  A Military Court Martial is the highest court in the United States. Because during the Viet Nam war, the president of the United States made an international announcement that was a verbal presidential order, stating, I want all attorneys to work together on anyone charged with a military crime resulting in a military court martial to work toward an alternative plea. This means that in a military court martial in the United States, the only things in a military court martial you are guaranteed as a defendant are: your Jag attorney which is the equivalent of a public defender, is under presidential law to stand next to you in court while your case is heard, satisfying the Constitution that you are defended, but the attorney is only standing next to you in the body because he is ordered to work with the prosecution. Therefore the only right you have as a defendant in a military court martial is the right to “Disclosure.” Disclosure is guaranteed to a defendant in a military court martial, of what exactly the defendant did to be charged with a crime.

 

      When a lower court charges a defendant with a crime in a county, such as a misdemeanor or felony, and the court and the district attorney’s office and the “information” or “initial complaint” filed against the defendant is just a law excerpt from a law book, and verbally and by document these agents refuses to cooperate with the person charged as to what exactly in description, what was done or said with specific date, time, location and address, included in the statement of what or whom evidenced by, this is called a refusal of disclosure on the State’s side. When the public defender refuses to discuss your defense, or look at your documents, saying I know you are guilty; I just stepped out of the DA’s office and I have all the documents I need; I know you’re guilty, and refuses to discuss your defense, that is called refusal of disclosure on the Defense’s side. In that case, the defendant has received full non-disclosure.

 

       If the courts of that county answer questions stating they are not breaking any laws of their state by denying you knowing what you are accused of, and this is obviously guaranteed under the Constitution of their state and the Federal Government of the United States, and the courts of that state deny lying while on the bench, then they must not be lying. The only other type of law in the United States is called Admiralty Law. Admiralty Law simply means, if you are arrested, you are guilty, and you must be sentenced. The only time Admiralty Law is used is when it replaces the United States Constitution in the event of Martial Law is in force. How long has this been going on?

 

       President Obama made a verbal law after in office two weeks stating, I want everyone who carries a sidearm to include your local police department to be considered part of the United States Military. Where did that come from? So now when the police drive by and look at you, it's not just to see if you are commiting a crime, you are under direct surveillance by the government. Isn't that Martial Law?

       Well, if you don't believe that, when you go to court you will. The judges all tell you you have constitutional rights in their court room, right? Did anyone inform you that the court reporter does not transcribe anything you say to the court, unless a trial has begun? (It's all done in shorthand transcription, in the court reporters words, not yours. The court reporter knows how the court wants him to transcribe, to omit any errors of proceedings, so the case can be legally completed for that hearing). Immediately get a copy of the transcript after each hearing, and see what I mean.That is so all the illegal plea bargains done by the court have no appealable grounds on any cases. Nice and neat and clean transcripts. When will everyone figure out that the United States Constitution is not used in the courtroom, that the judges are using Admiralty Law. The judges are not only lying to you about that you have Constitutional Rights, but are using Admiralty Law, which states, if you are arrested, you are guilty, and you must be punished. Admiralty Law is only used in the United States when Martial Law is in force. So with 97% of the people in prison in the United States handled with forced plea bargains and threats, there complaining about the other 3%.

       So with the prisons full in the United States with these victim of the courts Citizens, I have to ask the question:

WHEN WAS THE BEGINNING OF WHEN THE UNITED STATES WAS THE LAST TIME PLACED UNDER MARTIAL LAW? WAS IT WHEN THE JAPANESE WERE PLACED IN CAMPS IN THE UNITED STATES DURING WORLD WAR II?



What is happening since Russia refused to sign the nuclear weapons reduction treaty for President Obama?

File:    WhiteHouseObamaNotBackingDownNukePact11172010

 

White House: Obama not backing down on nuke pact
November 17, 2010 18:30 EST

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The White House says it thinks the support is there for Senate ratification of a nuclear arms pact with Russia before the end of the lame-duck session of Congress.

Supporters may have to win approval without the help of Republican Sen. John Kyl, who says more time is needed to consider the treaty. And moderate Republican Sen. George Voinovich of Ohio, who is retiring at the end of the year, is also expressing reservations with the treaty.

But another leading Republican, Richard Lugar, says the administration should push ahead with the treaty, which he supports.

The treaty would reduce U.S. and Russian strategic warheads to 1,550 for each country from the current ceiling of 2,200. It also would set up new procedures to allow both countries to inspect each other's arsenals to verify compliance.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is calling for quick action on the treaty. Reid says he's "puzzled" by Kyl's effort to delay consideration.


PERSONAL INWA DIRECTOR NOTATION:  That's funny. I learned to count too.  The count must be for just land based missiles operated inside the United States. Does not look like the count includes United States controlled missiles in other countries around the world, or submarines, aircraft carriers, and battleships The Obama Treaty would not include missiles in space, or on other planets if those exist. I might say the same for Russia. That would not make the treaty a 30% reduction in nuclear weapons by Russia and the United States, as President Obama claimed, not even if we are talking about just ground missiles. More importantly, where are these reduced nuclear weapons going to be used? Their disassembly may not be permanent.



Writing document 12022010

 

The United States can not survive a nuclear war from the launch of a nuclear weapon from Russia, because the devastation to the United States would most certainly change the United States into unlivable and unbearable living conditions for the remaining survivors. Likewise, if Russia became involved in a nuclear war with the United States, Russia would be devastated and experience severe hardships by their survivors. Such a war is unthinkable.

 

The point has been reached where any possibilities of being an enemy between Russia and the United States need to be resolved and dissolved as the alternative to nuclear war.

 


File:    writing document 12022010

The distrust of each other by the United States and Russia must be stopped.  Cooperation between Russia and the United States has been occurring for some time, for example, when Russia came to the aid of the United States to stage aircraft for refueling from aircraft carrier to attack Iraq and now is the time to make that adjustment. A nuclear weapons sneak or preemptive first strike nuclear attack makes all treaties between these two countries fragile as they treat each other as an enemy, and there may not be a guarantee of Honor between enemies.
This is why the INWA Treaty is written for all countries to honor.